AGGIORNAMENTI
PER UN SOMMARIO DELLE ULTIME NOVITA' PRESENTI SUL SITO > CLICCA QUI <
 
IN LIBRERIA


 
CAMPAGNE
APPELLO AL MINISTRO DELLA SALUTE ON. LIVIA TURCO
PER UNA LEGGE A TUTELA DEI DIRITTI DEI PAZIENTI
INDAGINE SULL'USO TERAPEUTICO DELLA CANNABIS IN ITALIA
NOTIZIE
MEDICALCANNABIS NEWS
ATTI PARLAMENTARI
RASSEGNA STAMPA
NOVITA' DALLA RICERCA
CONVEGNI E DIBATTITI
COMUNICATI STAMPA
MEDICALCANNABIS FORUM
MEDICALCANNABIS F.A.Q.
SCHEDE
POTENZIALI CAMPI DI UTILIZZO TERAPEUTICO
ESPERIENZE PERSONALI
CENNI STORICI
CANNABINOIDI NATURALI E DI SINTESI
ANANDAMIDE ED ENDOCANNABINOIDI
CENNI DI NEUROFISIOLOGIA DEI CANNABINOIDI
MODALITA' DI ASSUNZIONE
POSOLOGIA E DOSAGGI
LIBRI CONSIGLIATI
LINKS UTILI
SPECIALE
CANNABIS MEDICA OLANDA
CANNABIS MEDICA CANADA
CANNABIS MEDICA U.S.A.
DOSSIER
RAPPORTO DEI LORDS
RAPPORTO ROQUES
RAPPORTO IOM
LIBRO BIANCO
MATERIALI ACT
CHI SIAMO
CARTA D'INTENTI
STATUTO
ADERISCI AD ACT
DONAZIONI
CIAO STEVE !
premio di laurea
Stefano Girardi
2004-2005
IACM
We are members of

 

 
E-mail
 

Torna alla pagina precedente

Notizie dal mondo della Ricerca - Terapia del Dolore
Johnson JR, Burnell-Nugent M, Lossignol D, Ganae-Motan ED, Potts R, Fallon MT.

Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of THC:CBD Extract and THC Extract in Patients With Intractable Cancer-Related Pain.



OBJECTIVES: This study compared the efficacy of a tetrahydrocannabinol:cannabidiol (THC:CBD) extract, a nonopioid analgesic endocannabinoid system modulator, and a THC extract, with placebo, in relieving pain in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: In total, 177 patients with cancer pain, who experienced inadequate analgesia despite chronic opioid dosing, entered a two-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Patients were randomized to THC:CBD extract (n = 60), THC extract (n = 58), or placebo (n = 59). RESULTS: The primary analysis of change from baseline in mean pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score was statistically significantly in favor of THC:CBD compared with placebo (improvement of -1.37 vs. -0.69), whereas the THC group showed a nonsignificant change (-1.01 vs. -0.69). Twice as many patients taking THC:CBD showed a reduction of more than 30% from baseline pain NRS score when compared with placebo (23 [43%] vs. 12 [21%]). The associated odds ratio was statistically significant, whereas the number of THC group responders was similar to placebo (12 [23%] vs. 12 [21%]) and did not reach statistical significance. There was no change from baseline in median dose of opioid background medication or mean number of doses of breakthrough medication across treatment groups. No significant group differences were found in the NRS sleep quality or nausea scores or the pain control assessment. However, the results from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Questionnaire showed a worsening in nausea and vomiting with THC:CBD compared with placebo (P = 0.02), whereas THC had no difference (P = 1.0). Most drug-related adverse events were mild/moderate in severity.

CONCLUSION: This study shows that THC:CBD extract is efficacious for relief of pain in patients with advanced cancer pain not fully relieved by strong opioids.

testo integrale dell'articolo

 

Torna alla pagina precedente


http://medicalcannabis.it - powered by CuteNews